<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fabrication: PureMvc cleaned up.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:49:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lilblacky</title>
		<link>http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>lilblacky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/?p=15#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this it&#039;s been helpful. I&#039;m missing one thing with fabrication.. how do I registerCommands at the facade level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this it&#8217;s been helpful. I&#8217;m missing one thing with fabrication.. how do I registerCommands at the facade level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmennenoh</title>
		<link>http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>dmennenoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/?p=15#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Just an FYI - but CamelCase, or upper CamelCase is not camelCase. In camelCase the first letter is lower case - always. Making the first letter upper case is called PascalCase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an FYI &#8211; but CamelCase, or upper CamelCase is not camelCase. In camelCase the first letter is lower case &#8211; always. Making the first letter upper case is called PascalCase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cease</title>
		<link>http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>cease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/?p=15#comment-22</guid>
		<description>hey thanks for the reply , yeah actually that helps out a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey thanks for the reply , yeah actually that helps out a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/?p=15#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time out to read the article. You do pose a good question though. I see in the wiki where it says that. However, looking at the wiki, it does say &quot;when using modular applications&quot;. I am not sure if this means you are loading flex modules by chance. 

Digging into the source, I noticed it said this within IFabrication.as


&quot;It allows the Fabrication apparatus to use reflection inside a module application swf from the parent shell swf.&quot;

My guess is that this refers to the situations of if you have similarly named  components within your module that  you load into your parent application. I know with cairngorm, we had to make sure the we did not run into conflicts with similarly named event names, and we used  the fully qualified pathnames. My GUESS is that this would be  the same thing. I am just guessing though. 

Hope that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time out to read the article. You do pose a good question though. I see in the wiki where it says that. However, looking at the wiki, it does say &#8220;when using modular applications&#8221;. I am not sure if this means you are loading flex modules by chance. </p>
<p>Digging into the source, I noticed it said this within IFabrication.as</p>
<p>&#8220;It allows the Fabrication apparatus to use reflection inside a module application swf from the parent shell swf.&#8221;</p>
<p>My guess is that this refers to the situations of if you have similarly named  components within your module that  you load into your parent application. I know with cairngorm, we had to make sure the we did not run into conflicts with similarly named event names, and we used  the fully qualified pathnames. My GUESS is that this would be  the same thing. I am just guessing though. </p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cease</title>
		<link>http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>cease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/?p=15#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Hi good writeup .  Question - on the wiki it says 

override public function getClassByName(path:String):Class {
        return getDefinitionByName(path) as Class;      
}

must be defined somewhere.  I don&#039;t see it anywhere in your example.  is it not needed anymore ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi good writeup .  Question &#8211; on the wiki it says </p>
<p>override public function getClassByName(path:String):Class {<br />
        return getDefinitionByName(path) as Class;<br />
}</p>
<p>must be defined somewhere.  I don&#8217;t see it anywhere in your example.  is it not needed anymore ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darshan Sawardekar</title>
		<link>http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Darshan Sawardekar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/?p=15#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hey Marcel,

Thanks for taking the time to try Fabrication, much appreciated.

peace,
darshan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Marcel,</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to try Fabrication, much appreciated.</p>
<p>peace,<br />
darshan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using respondTo and reactTo &#124; CodeDrunks</title>
		<link>http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/2009/01/27/fabrication-puremvc-cleaned-up/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Using respondTo and reactTo &#124; CodeDrunks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codeofdoom.com/wordpress/?p=15#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] has written a very thorough article which takes a look at a two Fabrication features that help to reduce the boilerplate in PureMVC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has written a very thorough article which takes a look at a two Fabrication features that help to reduce the boilerplate in PureMVC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
