Comments on: Fabrication: PureMvc cleaned up.

By: Srinivas Ayyagari

Srinivas Ayyagari — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 20:08:05 +0000

We have used PureMVC with Fabrication and built a flex application .Good work done by Fabrication team and way the events and notifications are abstracted is really superub.Nice work guys.The application went live and we received good feedback from our management and users

By: lilblacky

lilblacky — Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:44:22 +0000

Thanks for this it’s been helpful. I’m missing one thing with fabrication.. how do I registerCommands at the facade level?

By: dmennenoh

dmennenoh — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:10:06 +0000

Just an FYI – but CamelCase, or upper CamelCase is not camelCase. In camelCase the first letter is lower case – always. Making the first letter upper case is called PascalCase.

By: cease

cease — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:24:52 +0000

hey thanks for the reply , yeah actually that helps out a lot.

By: admin

admin — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:01:15 +0000

Thanks for taking the time out to read the article. You do pose a good question though. I see in the wiki where it says that. However, looking at the wiki, it does say “when using modular applications”. I am not sure if this means you are loading flex modules by chance.

Digging into the source, I noticed it said this within IFabrication.as

“It allows the Fabrication apparatus to use reflection inside a module application swf from the parent shell swf.”

My guess is that this refers to the situations of if you have similarly named components within your module that you load into your parent application. I know with cairngorm, we had to make sure the we did not run into conflicts with similarly named event names, and we used the fully qualified pathnames. My GUESS is that this would be the same thing. I am just guessing though.

Hope that helps.

By: cease

cease — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 03:06:14 +0000

Hi good writeup . Question – on the wiki it says

override public function getClassByName(path:String):Class {
return getDefinitionByName(path) as Class;
}

must be defined somewhere. I don’t see it anywhere in your example. is it not needed anymore ?

By: Darshan Sawardekar

Darshan Sawardekar — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:00:13 +0000

Hey Marcel,

Thanks for taking the time to try Fabrication, much appreciated.

peace,
darshan

By: Using respondTo and reactTo | CodeDrunks

Using respondTo and reactTo | CodeDrunks — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:56:52 +0000

[...] has written a very thorough article which takes a look at a two Fabrication features that help to reduce the boilerplate in PureMVC [...]